The Power Struggle Behind the Throne: How WEF-Backed Elites Seek Control Over America’s Financial System

The Power Struggle Behind the Throne: How WEF-Backed Elites Seek Control Over America’s Financial System

 by Germanico Vaca

Nathan Mayer Rothschild famously declared, “Give me control of a nation’s money, and I care not who makes the laws.” Today, this sentiment appears alive and well, with the World Economic Forum (WEF) at the forefront. The WEF, in many ways, seems like a modern-day Hydra—a reincarnation of the old power structures it claims to replace. As figures associated with the WEF, like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Vivek Ramaswamy, gain influence, there’s a sense that a new, shadowy entity is quietly pulling the strings. While outwardly promoting agendas that appear benign, their goal may be much more insidious: seizing control over America’s financial future.

 WEF and Its Young Global Leaders: In Plain Sight, Yet Hidden Intentions

The WEF, through its alumni and “Young Global Leaders” program, has positioned key individuals across various industries. Figures like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Vivek Ramaswamy publicly support values such as innovation and free enterprise. However, they also back monopolistic ventures that could centralize economic power to an unprecedented degree. These same individuals have even extended their financial influence to Donald Trump, allegedly backing him in hopes of consolidating their financial power. What lies beneath this alignment is a shared ambition to reshape America’s monetary system, with the Federal Reserve potentially in their crosshairs.

 

The Plan: A New System, Total Financial Control

The plan seems clear. By influencing U.S. economic policy from within, these elites could weaken the Federal Reserve, paving the way for a new, centralized system where they control the money supply. Thiel, for instance, has always promoted payment technology as a means of freedom. As the founder of PayPal, he once suggested the platform could become a digital alternative to a Swiss bank—untouchable by governments. With their collective power, they could turn platforms like X (formerly Twitter) into the nation’s de facto financial transaction hub, similar to WeChat’s dominance in China. This vision would allow them near-total oversight of financial transactions, potentially leaving banks obsolete and vulnerable populations, like immigrants, at their mercy.

 

The Social Consequences: A Repressive Regime

A financial system controlled by WEF elites would likely come with a new set of repressive social controls. Thiel, Musk, and Ramaswamy, like many of their supporters, espouse deeply conservative values, often critical of immigration and dismissive of gender equity. In this future scenario, financial punishment could be a tool of repression: immigrant groups and marginalized communities could find their financial assets frozen or diverted at the touch of a button. They are pretending to renounce the WEF, but the clown stops being a clown out of the circus. 

 

Internal Tensions: A Clash of Titans

While each of these figures may currently work in tandem, their ambitions are ultimately irreconcilable. Each sees themselves as a world-shaper, but none appear willing to yield power to another. This dynamic could be the very reason why their vision, as cohesive as it seems, may implode.

Peter Thiel: Thiel has poured money into political and tech ventures that support his libertarian ideology. Unable to run for president himself, he has championed Trump as a potential figurehead who could drive his agenda forward. However, Trump is notorious for being unwilling to share power or credit. He is the most dangerous and scary. A descendant of Nazis. 

 Donald Trump: Trump, though currently benefitting from Thiel’s backing, will not likely tolerate being anyone’s puppet. If he perceives that his financial backers seek control beyond their initial support, his instinct will be to cut ties, potentially creating a political rift within his own support base. It seems he was unaware that he has always been the chosen puppet of many. 

 Elon Musk: Musk, driven by visions of technological supremacy, sees himself as the “big fish” in Trump’s pond, envisioning his companies as the inevitable beneficiaries of this political alignment. However, both Trump and Thiel likely view Musk as expendable. If Musk’s legal issues worsen, they may use the opportunity to weaken him and potentially seize his assets. 

 Vivek Ramaswamy: As a Young Global Leader of the WEF, Ramaswamy represents a more entrenched WEF influence. His presence ensures that WEF ideologies remain embedded in American policy debates, providing a direct line to the very organization these elites publicly critique yet privately emulate.

 Klaus Schwab’s Long Game: The Utopian Agenda

Behind this power struggle lies Klaus Schwab’s vision for a utopian “Agenda 2030” and “Project 2025,” which openly aims to establish a one-world government. Under this system, corporations, not nations, would dictate public policy, and private financial control would replace democratic regulation. The United States, long viewed as a bastion of democracy and free enterprise, would find itself governed not by elected officials but by tech barons wielding influence over national finances. No MAGA idiot needs to apply, they have already been thrown to the wolves. 

 The Looming Crisis

The United States is at a crossroads. This struggle is not simply about control over financial technology but over the very essence of American democracy. The actions of these powerful figures pose a threat to the balance of power within the U.S., with financial control potentially becoming a tool for ideological repression. While the immediate risk may seem abstract, the implications are real and urgent.

 For the average American, this alliance among tech giants, political elites, and WEF operatives may seem like just another conspiracy theory. Yet, the ambition and reach of these players—and the stakes they’re fighting for—mean that the repercussions could affect every aspect of daily life, from bank access to freedom of speech.

 Ultimately, this unbridled pursuit of centralized power will likely lead to internal conflict. The powerhouses currently aligned in purpose will find themselves unable to coexist, torn apart by their own egos and conflicting ambitions. And when that happens, it may be the very thing that prevents this vision of an authoritarian financial regime from ever taking full control