Challenging Discriminatory and Unconstitutional Policies: A Call for Legal and Civic Action

 

Challenging Discriminatory and Unconstitutional Policies: A Call for Legal and Civic Action

by Germanico Vaca

1. Blatant Discrimination Against U.S. Citizens

Proposals to revoke the citizenship of natural-born U.S. citizens based on the immigration status of their parents are unconstitutional and amount to blatant racial and ethnic discrimination.

• Fourteenth Amendment Protections:
  The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment is explicit: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
• Attempts to reinterpret or nullify this foundational protection directly contradict constitutional guarantees.
• No president or Congress has the authority to strip citizenship retroactively based on parental status without violating this clause.
• Retroactive Punishment:
  Under U.S. and international law, it is impermissible to punish individuals retroactively for actions or circumstances that were legal at the time.
• Ex Post Facto Clause (Article I, Section 9): The Constitution prohibits Congress from passing ex post facto laws that retroactively criminalize actions or impose penalties.
• Stripping citizenship from individuals born under lawful constitutional protections is a violation of due process and would disproportionately target minority communities, reflecting racial bias rather than legal principles.

2. Threats to Withhold Federal Funds as Political Leverage

Recent statements by Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, suggesting withholding federal disaster relief funds from California unless the state complies with presidential demands, are illegal and represent an abuse of power.

• Violation of the Spending Clause:
• The federal government cannot withhold funds allocated by Congress for specific purposes—such as disaster recovery—as leverage for unrelated political demands.
• The Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8) of the Constitution mandates that federal funds be used for the general welfare, not as tools for advancing partisan agendas.
• Supreme Court Precedent:
• In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012), the Supreme Court ruled that federal funds could not be used to coerce states into compliance with federal mandates.
• Holding disaster relief hostage for unrelated demands, particularly racially or politically motivated ones, violates this principle.

3. Evidence of Racism and Discrimination

Both proposals—targeting natural-born citizens of Hispanic descent and threatening to withhold federal funds from states like California—reflect a pattern of racism and discriminatory practices.

• Targeting Hispanic Communities:
  The historical context, particularly in disaster recovery (e.g., Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Ike), demonstrates that Hispanic workers and communities have been instrumental in rebuilding efforts.
• Policies that strip citizenship or create barriers disproportionately affect these communities, despite their contributions to the U.S. economy and society.
• Discriminatory Motives:
• Threats to states like California, which are home to large immigrant and minority populations, underscore the racial undertones of these policies.
• Such actions violate not only the spirit of equal protection under the law but also basic principles of justice and fairness.

4. Legal and Constitutional Remedies

To challenge these unconstitutional and discriminatory policies, several legal avenues are available:

1. Class Action Lawsuits:
• Affected individuals and civil rights organizations can file lawsuits challenging retroactive citizenship revocation as unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment and Ex Post Facto Clause.
• Federal courts must address such challenges to uphold the Constitution.
2. Injunctions Against Withholding Federal Funds:
• States like California can seek injunctions to prevent the federal government from withholding disaster relief funds, citing violations of the Spending Clause and Supreme Court precedents.
3. Civil Rights Act Complaints:
• Policies and statements reflecting racial discrimination may be challenged under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, particularly if they disproportionately harm Hispanic and immigrant communities.
4. Advocacy for Congressional Oversight:
• Congress has the authority to investigate and censure actions that misuse federal funds or violate constitutional principles.
• Advocacy groups should call for accountability through congressional hearings and public oversight.

5. Broader Implications

These discriminatory policies not only harm targeted communities but also undermine national unity and the rule of law:

• Economic Fallout: Stripping citizenship and withholding disaster relief funds destabilizes communities, hampers economic growth, and exacerbates labor shortages, especially in reconstruction efforts.
• Legal Precedent: Allowing such policies to go unchallenged sets a dangerous precedent for future administrations, eroding constitutional protections for all Americans.
• Moral Leadership: The U.S. has historically been a beacon of equality and opportunity. Policies rooted in discrimination tarnish this legacy and weaken the nation’s global standing.

6. Call to Action

To address these pressing issues, it is imperative to:

1. Organize Legal Challenges:
• Partner with civil rights organizations, legal experts, and affected communities to file lawsuits and injunctions.
2. Raise Public Awareness:
• Highlight the contributions of Hispanic communities and the dangers of discriminatory policies through media campaigns and public advocacy.
3. Demand Accountability:
• Call on Congress to investigate and hold officials accountable for unconstitutional actions.
• Advocate for judicial review of policies that violate constitutional principles.
4. Promote Immigration Reform:
• Push for comprehensive immigration reform that recognizes the historical and ongoing contributions of immigrant communities to the U.S. economy and society.
• SOS to Humanity: The Vaca Plan for Immigration 

Inauguration day or day of mourning?

 

Inauguration day or day of Mourning? 

by Germanico Vaca

As January 20, 2025, approaches—the fateful day when the new President of the United States will be inaugurated—I must admit that I’m teetering on the brink of existential despair. It feels as though the U.S. is poised to dive headfirst into a period of unimaginable darkness, like a badly written sequel to an already terrible franchise. Why? Because the man preparing to take the reins is less "leader of the free world" and more "QVC salesman meets medieval court jester." Yes, I’m talking about Donald Trump.

Leadership, in its true form, is about unity, inspiration, and vision. A leader should elevate not just their nation but the world. Trump, however, seems less interested in uplifting humanity and more focused on selling branded hats, NFTs, and conspiracy theories. (Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if he started peddling a "Build the Wall" crypto coin next—backed by nothing but hot air and his sheer audacity. Trump may tokenize his lies and sell them as NFT's)

For nine long years, Trump’s divisive rhetoric has loomed over America like a bad smell from his diaper you just can’t get rid of. The man thrives on chaos, pitting neighbor against neighbor, all while hawking whatever snake oil he’s cooked up that week. And if he’s not selling something, he’s threatening someone. By now, even Denmark, Panama, and Canada are nervously checking their door locks, wondering what they did to earn a spot on Trump’s hit list.

In a recent press conference, a reporter dared to ask why Trump seemed fixated on these countries. After a deep sniffle (Adderall kicking in) and some suspicious diaper-related sound effects, Trump delivered an incoherent word salad that would leave even the most skilled linguists baffled. Of course. Trump claims that whenever he embarks in some incoherent rambling is "the weave" a genius netting of amphetamines inspired shit, the phrase “concept of a plan” made an appearance, as did his uncle from MIT (naturally). And just when you thought it couldn’t get weirder, Trump declared he might simply tell the aliens to leave. Why? Because, of course, “aliens respect me. I have the best words. They know it. Everyone knows it.” Nobody could understand if he was referring to illegal aliens of the pesky riders of the New Jersey drones. 

Meanwhile, Americans are left grappling with real disasters: climate change, economic instability, unending California fires (because they could have avoided the fires if only, they would have listened to Trump and raked 163,695 square miles according to the moron in chief) and the looming threat of Yellowstone erupting. (To be fair, if Yellowstone does blow, maybe it can take Trump with it. I’m sure the Mexicans would raise a tequila toast to that.) Over family dinners, Mexicans don’t even bother discussing the alien drones over New Jersey—they’re too busy muttering, “Pinche Trump.”

Trump’s "strategy" for dealing with, well, everything seems to involve negotiating or obeying the reptilian elite. Rumor has it that he’s bartering Mar-a-Lago for Jupiter—because, as he reportedly quipped, “Mars is a dump. It’s just desert. Jupiter is yuge, and it has Ivanka vibes.” (No word yet on whether Larry Fink or Klaus Schwab are packing their bags for Jupiter too, but hey, the lizard king’s schedule is probably tight.)

The tragedy here isn’t just Trump’s mind-bending narcissism; it’s the wasted potential of a nation led astray by someone who thinks diplomacy is calling everyone “stupid” and policy is whatever pops into his head during his morning Diet Coke ritual. Imagine if we had a president who embraced technological innovation, environmental stewardship, and global cooperation instead of acting like a budget Bond villain.

But no, Trump’s vision for America involves economic collapse, as Trump wants to create to massive bubbles, the crypto bubble and the derivatives debt bubble which will pop the US dollar and the USA maybe facing total collapse, rampant division, and a tariff-driven isolationism that might as well come with a free MAGA hat. His approach to global challenges—climate change, AI, international collaboration—makes about as much sense as handing a toddler the nuclear codes. Once Americans faced massive hyperinflation they may join the Mexican word "Pinche Trump"

And what’s his answer to crises like alien invasions or rising sea levels? “I’ll figure it out. Maybe. Or I won’t. You’ll see.” Socrates, rolling in his grave, reminds us that justice is acting rightly no matter the consequences. Trump? He skips right past justice and dives headlong into whatever benefits him most, whether it’s sowing discord, hoarding power, or making yet another incoherent teleprompter speech that leaves the nation collectively facepalming.

The real question is: what compels this man to think he has the right to act so destructively? It’s not leadership—it’s egomania. A leader should offer hope and solutions, not lies and chaos. Yet here we are, America teetering on the brink, with a president who believes he’s the smartest man in the room because he once built a tacky hotel and yelled at Rosie O’Donnell on Twitter.

But hey, maybe the aliens will save us. Or better yet, maybe they’ll take Trump with them. One can dream. Using Trump’s own words “Father Enki, brother Marduck, cousin Ninurta if you are listening, Please, take him away.”

Leadership in Contrast: Bill Clinton vs. Donald Trump

 

Leadership in Contrast: Bill Clinton vs. Donald Trump

By Germanico Vaca

When President William Jefferson Clinton swore in Robert E. Rubin as the 70th Secretary of the Treasury, he was already one of the most knowledgeable and best-prepared leaders of finance to assume the office. Before entering public service, Secretary Rubin worked for twenty-six years at Goldman Sachs & Company, one of Wall Street's venerable investment firms, where he rose to the position of Co-Chairman. He was originally appointed by President Clinton to be Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and to serve as the Nation's first director of the National Economic Council (1993–1995), which coordinated economic policy throughout the Clinton Administration. With his vast experience in financial markets and collegial temperament, he helped President Clinton, and his economic team develop an economic policy based on vigorous deficit reduction, global open markets, and investments in education, training, and the environment. This program helped to spark and sustain the longest economic expansion in the Nation's history to date, transforming the Nation's budgetary position from deficit to surplus, and producing the lowest national rates of unemployment in decades. But Rubin was clear to give credit to Bill Clinton for making the right decisions at the right time. 

One of the defining moments according to Rubin, was during Mexico’s economic crisis. Most advisors urged President Clinton to let Mexico collapse, framing it as a problem the U.S. shouldn’t intervene in. However, Clinton asked a crucial question: “What are the potential losses for American companies invested in Mexico?” Learning that these losses would amount to billions upon billions of dollars, Clinton made a decisive choice to act. Under Clinton's orders and guidance, the U.S. provided Mexico with a loan package twice the amount it needed, secured against Mexican oil at a fixed price. This decision not only stabilized Mexico’s economy but also ensured the U.S. reaped significant financial gains as oil prices tripled in subsequent years. This demonstrated Clinton’s ability to think long-term, protect American economic interests, and strengthen diplomatic ties.

Trump’s Ignorance of Global Economic Dynamics

By contrast, Donald Trump’s policies reflect an unfathomable ignorance bordering stupidity and lack of understanding of such intricate economic and geopolitical relationships. For example, Trump’s tariffs on Mexican goods—intended as penalties on the Mexican government—ultimately taxes American companies operating in Mexico. This shortsighted approach harmed U.S. businesses and consumers while failing to address the underlying issues.

The Cost of Myopia

Where Clinton’s decisions fostered stability and mutual benefit, Trump’s impulsive actions risk alienating allies and weakening the U.S.’s global standing. His failure to grasp that China, India, and other nations depend heavily on South American resources further demonstrates his lack of foresight. For instance, while Trump threatens Latin American nations, China is already investing billions in infrastructure, fisheries, and renewable energy across the region, solidifying its influence.

Leadership Qualities That Matter

Clinton’s example highlights the importance of listening to expert advice, analyzing data, and prioritizing long-term gains over short-term political wins. In contrast, Trump’s actions risk undermining the very economic and strategic interests he claims to protect, leaving the U.S. vulnerable to competitors like China and Russia.

Leadership requires vision, knowledge, and the ability to adapt to complex global realities. Clinton’s strategic interventions during Rubin’s tenure exemplify this, while Trump’s shortsighted policies illustrate the dangers of ignorance and impulsiveness in global affairs. As we move forward I hope and pray someone considers this:

1. The Rubin-Clinton Example:
• The Mexico Bailout: When Mexico faced an economic collapse during Bill Clinton’s presidency, most advisors suggested letting Mexico fail, framing it as Mexico's problem.
• Clinton’s Strategic Perspective: Instead of following the majority opinion, Clinton asked a critical question: “What are the potential losses for American companies invested in Mexico?” When told the losses would amount to billions, Clinton made a decisive choice to support Mexico with a loan package.
• Outcome: Clinton ensured the loans were secured against Mexican oil at a fixed price. As oil prices tripled in subsequent years, the U.S. reaped significant financial gains while stabilizing a key trading partner.
• Lesson: This decision showcased Clinton's ability to think long-term, protect American economic interests, and strengthen diplomatic ties, all while turning a potential loss into a major profit for the U.S.
2. Trump’s Ignorance of Global Economic Dynamics:
• Trump’s approach of imposing tariffs on Mexico, framing them as penalties on the Mexican government, reveals a lack of understanding of the intricate relationship between the U.S. and Mexico. In fact, showcasing Trump’s unfathomable stupidity.
• Reality Check:
• Most large firms in Mexico are owned or heavily invested in by American companies.
• Tariffs on Mexican goods effectively tax these American firms, ultimately harming U.S. businesses and consumers.
• Missed Opportunity: Rather than leveraging Mexico as a partner for mutual economic gain, Trump’s policies strain the relationship, weakening the U.S.’s position in North America and opening doors for competitors like China.
3. The Cost of Myopia:
• Clinton’s Approach: Strategic investment in Mexico strengthened the U.S. economy and its geopolitical position.
• Trump’s Approach: Shortsighted measures, like tariffs and aggressive rhetoric, alienate allies, harm American companies, and fail to address the root causes of economic challenges.
4. Leadership Qualities That Matter:
• Clinton demonstrated the importance of listening to diverse perspectives, analyzing data, and prioritizing American interests in a broader context.
• Trump’s inability to grasp the nuances of global economics and his impulsive decision-making put American businesses, allies, and global standing at risk.

We Are In an Economic War

 

By Germanico Vaca

Most Americans are not even aware that BRICS nations have signed an accord and are moving away from the U.S. dollar by agreement, and that is a huge game changer for trade. It could have significant ramifications for global demand for U.S. treasuries and the dollar itself. If major economies like the BRICS countries, and China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia stop using the dollar for oil and commodities trading, the global demand for the dollar could decrease significantly, putting downward pressure on its value.

Part 1: Crypto Market Dynamics in the Current Economic War

1. The Strategic Role of Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies have been misunderstood as decentralized, borderless financial tools that challenge traditional monetary systems. However, this perception is largely a façade. The reality is that all cryptos are traded in US dollars, so it does not matter what the name of the dog, you still paying with US dollar for the DOG. Here’s how cryptos align with global strategies:

• For the U.S.:
Donald Trump, supported by over-ambitious DOGE/WEF operatives, appears to view cryptocurrencies as a potential savior for the American economy. This perspective ignores the looming collapse of U.S. dollar demand as BRICS transitions to its own payment systems and Saudi Arabia shifts to yuan-backed bonds, ending the petrodollar era.

Trump believes Bitcoin and Ethereum could serve as "global, neutral currencies," maintaining U.S. financial influence beyond sovereign control. However, this strategy risks creating a speculative bubble, exacerbating U.S. debt, inflation, and counterfeiting. The outcome would likely be unprecedented hyperinflation and a devastating economic collapse.

• For China:
China views cryptocurrencies as both a threat and an opportunity. While cryptos undermine centralized control, they also provide a tool to weaken confidence in the dollar. Since cryptos are traded in U.S. dollars, China can strategically profit from their volatility while positioning its digital yuan, potentially backed by gold, as a stable alternative post-collapse.

• For Russia and BRICS:
Russia may use cryptocurrencies to bypass sanctions and operate outside U.S.-dominated banking systems. BRICS nations could quietly leverage cryptos as a transitional tool, accumulating them as reserve assets until unified financial mechanisms are established. This strategy neutralizes the U.S. dollar’s influence while redirecting capital to productive economic activities.

---

2. Timeline and Strategic Opportunities

The January–July 2024 crypto market forecast aligns with historical speculative cycles, providing a roadmap for potential events:

• January–March 2024:
Trump, Musk, and other influencers (Ramaswamy, Thiel, and Krishna) may push Congress to approve deregulation, bolstering cryptos and creating the illusion of an economic boom. However, this speculative surge, fueled by debt, would ignore long-term production and manufacturing needs, instead inflating a dangerous bubble.

• March 17, 2024:
If Russia dumps U.S. securities, the dollar weakens, pushing investors toward cryptos, precious metals, and commodities. China could strategically short cryptos to trigger a mid-year collapse or prop them up temporarily to destabilize U.S. financial systems further.

• June–July 2024:
A sharp decline in cryptos is likely, driven by over-leveraged positions, profit-taking, and potential regulatory actions. This collapse would devastate retail investors and erode confidence in decentralized systems, creating political and economic fallout.

---

3. Narratives of Key Players

• For the U.S.:
Trump aims to position cryptos as "neutral global currencies" to counter the digital yuan and BRICS alternatives. However, leveraging tools like Palantir to manipulate market sentiment and track crypto flows could unleash a beast that even U.S. systems cannot control.

• For China:
China’s strategy includes promoting the digital yuan as a stable alternative, influencing global perceptions of cryptos at critical moments, and strategically dumping U.S. securities and cryptos to manipulate prices.

• For BRICS:
BRICS nations might quietly accumulate Bitcoin and Ethereum to leverage them against the dollar. Their broader strategy focuses on transitioning from speculative assets to productive capital investments, exploiting Trump’s economic miscalculations.

---

Part 2: Financial Outcomes in the Economic War

1. Peter Thiel’s Role

Peter Thiel and Palantir play a shadow role in shaping U.S. strategies, particularly through data-driven financial analysis and AI tools:

• Thiel as a Strategist:
Thiel’s focus on decentralized technologies aligns with his geopolitical strategies. His investments in Bitcoin and Ethereum position him as a central figure in U.S. efforts to maintain Western financial influence, despite their inherent risks.

• Palantir’s Influence:
Palantir’s AI-driven tools likely analyze global financial flows, crypto trends, and geopolitical risks, offering the U.S. a tactical advantage. However, China’s advanced AI models may already counteract these efforts, exposing the vulnerabilities in Thiel’s plans.

---

2. Financial Outcomes to Watch

• Dollar Decline:
As BRICS nations reduce reliance on the dollar, demand for U.S. treasuries will decrease, driving up interest rates and weakening U.S. global financial dominance.

• Rise of the Petroyuan:
Saudi Arabia and OPEC nations adopting the yuan for oil trades could trigger a global shift, increasing reliance on China while risking overextension.

• Global Inflation and Market Instability:
A declining dollar would fuel inflation in import-heavy nations, leading to social unrest and political instability. Cryptos might temporarily act as safe-haven assets.

• Crypto Boom and Collapse:
An initial crypto rally followed by a collapse would destabilize retail investors globally, triggering political backlash and stricter regulations.

---

3. Strategic Questions

• Are the U.S., China, and BRICS holding significant crypto assets, and could they weaponize a market collapse?
• If Palantir drives U.S. strategies, how might China counter its influence?
• Should nations pivot toward decentralized assets, or are centralized alternatives like the digital yuan inevitable winners?

---

Conclusion
The current economic war places cryptocurrencies at the center of global financial strategies. While the U.S. may attempt to leverage cryptos against China and BRICS, this approach carries immense risks, including speculative market dependencies and vulnerability to manipulation. Ultimately, the battle over cryptos reflects broader shifts in global power, with far-reaching implications for financial stability and geopolitical influence.

An open letter to the Senate and Congress to SAVE America

 

Subject: Urgent Call for Congressional Oversight: Preventing a Catastrophic Economic Collapse Due to Proposed Crypto Policies

Dear Senators and Congressmen of the United States:

The United States stands at a pivotal crossroads, where decisions made in the coming months could determine our nation’s economic stability for generations. I am writing to urge you to take immediate action by forming a congressional committee to study and respond to the alarming economic policies hinted at by incoming President Donald Trump, particularly those reflected in Senator Cynthia Lummis' proposed crypto strategy. These policies, if implemented, pose an existential threat to the United States economy and the livelihoods of millions of Americans.

The Problem: Bypassing Congressional Authority
Central to our system of checks and balances is Congress' authority over the budget and money supply. Any attempt to bypass this authority undermines the very fabric of our democracy. The suggestion that the United States could leverage Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies as a core part of its economic strategy not only circumvents congressional oversight but also exposes the country to unparalleled economic risks.

Trump’s apparent plan, as inferred from the Lummis bill, would involve propping up cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin using resources from the U.S. Treasury. This would effectively divert part of the national budget—without Congressional approval—to create a speculative bubble of U.S. dollar demand via Bitcoin. Such a move is not only unconstitutional but would inevitably lead to economic disaster.

The Illusion of Wealth vs. the Reality of Collapse
The rationale behind this plan appears to be that increasing Bitcoin's value would somehow protect the U.S. dollar and generate wealth. However, basic economic principles suggest the opposite:

• Hyperinflation Risk: Financing Bitcoin purchases with debt would expand the money supply at an unsustainable rate, leading to runaway inflation.
• Economic Inequity: Most Americans, especially those in lower-income brackets, could never afford Bitcoin at the speculative prices of $100,000 or $250,000 per coin, leaving them excluded from any perceived benefits.
• Energy Consumption: The Bitcoin network already consumes an estimated 160 terawatt-hours of electricity annually. Scaling this up to meet the proposed 16 trillion-dollar market cap would require 1.5 quadrillion terawatt-hours, an inconceivable and environmentally destructive amount of energy. (that is many times of electricity produced by the USA currently) 
• Speculative Instability: Cryptocurrencies do not produce intrinsic value, fuel industries, or support economic development. They serve as speculative instruments, parking money without generating real-world economic benefits.

A Bubble Waiting to Burst
Trump’s plan would essentially park $16 trillion in Bitcoin—an amount equivalent to 50% of the U.S. GDP—expecting this speculative bubble to grow and resolve economic challenges. However, history has shown that speculative bubbles inevitably burst. In this case, the collapse would simultaneously trigger:

1. A massive bubble of derivative debt.
2. A massive bubble of cryptocurrency debt.
3. A catastrophic hyperinflation crisis.

This chain reaction would decimate the U.S. economy, leaving us unable to fund essential programs, pay salaries, or service the national debt.

The Lummis Miscalculation
Senator Lummis has proposed that the United States aim to own 5% of all Bitcoin, or approximately $16 trillion worth. This reasoning is fundamentally flawed. Cryptocurrencies are denominated in U.S. dollars, meaning that increased investment in Bitcoin directly increases the money supply, fueling inflation. Worse, much of the money used to purchase Bitcoin comes from loans, creating layers of unsustainable debt.

The Hidden Beneficiaries
This plan would disproportionately benefit wealthy investors such as Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and other elites such as Black Rock and Vanguard with significant crypto holdings. They stand to gain enormous wealth from this speculative bubble, while ordinary Americans would face skyrocketing inflation, unaffordable living costs, and economic instability.

A Call to Action
Congress must act now to prevent this economic experiment from becoming reality. I propose the following steps:

1. Form a Congressional Committee: Investigate the legality and economic implications of using Treasury funds to invest in cryptocurrencies.
2. Legislation to Protect the Economy: Pass laws explicitly prohibiting the U.S. government from allocating taxpayer funds to speculative investments like Bitcoin.
3. Transparent Hearings: Hold public hearings to examine the economic, environmental, and social consequences of crypto-focused policies.
4. Immediate Oversight of Trump’s Plans: Preemptively address any attempts to bypass Congress and undermine its authority before they reach the implementation stage.

Conclusion
The stakes are too high to ignore. The proposed crypto strategy is a recipe for total economic collapse. It would enrich a small group of elites at the expense of the American people, destabilize the dollar, and undermine our global leadership. Congress must act decisively to safeguard our economic future.

I trust that you will recognize the urgency of this matter and take swift action to protect our nation. Thank you for your time and service. I am pretty good at predicting things. In 2017 I predicted 100% accurately what the first Trump four years will be. (SOS to Humanity: The destruction of the USA) Let us hope Trump assumes responsibility and follow the mandate of the American people. You represent the will of the American people. The president of the United States is elected to serve the interests of the American people. That principle is being ignored and shamefully the recent government shutdown threat exposed that somehow the current GOP senators and congressmen are under the disgusting illusion that they serve Donald Trump and President Elon Musk. Shame on you. I hope this does not become the prediction of the century. 

The Shift Away from the U.S. Dollar by BRICS

 

The Shift Away from the U.S. Dollar by BRICS

Most Americans are not even aware that BRICS nations have signed an accord and are moving away from the U.S. dollar by agreement, and that is a huge game changer for trade. It could have significant ramifications for global demand for U.S. treasuries and the dollar itself. If major economies like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia stop using the dollar for oil and commodities trading, the global demand for the dollar could decrease significantly, putting downward pressure on its value.

However, this transition is complex. BRICS nations face challenges in developing a system that rivals the dollar in liquidity, trust, and acceptance. While steps like swapping bonds or using alternative currencies for trade weaken the dollar’s position, it doesn’t collapse overnight.

---

Manufacturing a Bitcoin and Ethereum Bubble to Create Dollar Demand

Trump has brought in Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Krishna to make a play in cryptos. They are probably planning to inflate the value of Bitcoin and Ethereum as a means to manufacture demand for dollars because they have no other possible play. Here’s the rationale:

• The demand for US securities without the BRIC nations cannot sustain the US economy. To be able to create an illusion that there will be no contraption they need to create a massive bubble of demand for the US. Dollars. So cryptos are the only way.
• If Bitcoin and Ethereum skyrocket in price, investors globally may rush to acquire them. Since these cryptocurrencies are primarily traded in USD, this would create temporary demand for dollars.
• Speculative bubbles always burst, and eventually that bubble will burst, it could wipe out investor confidence, and of course, the Federal Reserve will sell the idea that such strategy will help draw capital back into “safe havens” like treasuries or USD holdings, stabilizing the dollar. However, the US dollar cannot stabilize because their debt will increase. After all, every single penny of the 3.29 trillion crypto markets is in US-denominated dollars. If that amount grows to 6.6 trillion, people sooner than later would realize that all of that is in money printed out of thin air and the truth will come out that the bitcoin and cryptos are as much a Ponzi scheme as the US dollar.

It’s not implausible that speculative asset bubbles can be created and burst strategically. Historically, markets have been influenced by policy changes, media narratives, and even coordinated actions. However, such a move would require immense coordination and buy-in from institutional players and financial elites. That is why Donald Trump is kneeling and kissing ass of Elon Musk.

---

Market Data and Trends

Looking at the data:

• Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Trends: While crypto markets are highly volatile, they tend to follow cycles influenced by macroeconomic factors (e.g., interest rates, regulatory news). If the Federal Reserve loosens monetary policy or if liquidity increases, it could fuel speculative growth in these assets.
• Global Liquidity Trends: With rising interest rates and economic uncertainty, global liquidity is constrained. If central banks shift to more accommodative policies, the inflow of cheap money could drive speculative investments like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
• Institutional Involvement: Large institutional players have been accumulating crypto assets. If they anticipate regulatory clarity or greater adoption, this could drive significant price increases in the short term.

---

Counterarguments

While the theory is compelling, there are some challenges:

• Lack of Control Over Crypto: Bitcoin and Ethereum are decentralized, and their market movements are driven by a mix of retail and institutional traders globally. Manufacturing a bubble at this scale would require a level of control that’s difficult to achieve.
• Dollar Alternatives: Creating demand for dollars via crypto bubbles may not solve the larger structural issues if BRICS nations succeed in creating viable trade systems outside the dollar.
• Speculative Bubbles Have Limits: Even if demand is created, the speculative nature of crypto means a crash could erode trust in all markets tied to it, including fiat currencies like the dollar.

---

What Might Happen?

Here’s another possible scenario based on current trends:

• Bitcoin and Ethereum Surge: If global uncertainty continues, Bitcoin and Ethereum could rise as speculative assets and potential hedges against inflation or currency instability. If the Federal Reserve signals a pivot to looser monetary policy, this would further fuel growth in risk assets like crypto.
• Global Dollar Demand Declines Gradually: While BRICS nations reduce reliance on the dollar, this process will take time. In the interim, the dollar could remain strong due to its role as the global reserve currency, (remember that while people say cryptos, all of that money is in US dollars) but cracks in the system would emerge.
• Cryptocurrency as a Hedge: As traditional financial systems face challenges, some investors may turn to crypto as a hedge against instability, leading to organic demand increases.

---

Conclusion

My prediction is that Trump is going to create a speculative crypto bubble driven by manufactured demand to support the dollar. The crypto market could indeed experience significant growth in 2025, and smart Latin nations should learn how to ride that bull, but whether this is part of a coordinated effort between the WEF operatives and the cuckold Trump remains to be seen or simply the result of macroeconomic factors remains uncertain.